Case 6020230/2025 · Employment Tribunal
C Khan v Castle Point Borough Council — 2026
- Case reference
- 6020230/2025
- Decision date
- 16 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge W Anderson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
C Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims for unpaid wages or breach of contract against Castle Point Borough Council. The respondent disputed jurisdiction, saying the claimant was an agency worker, the claim was out of time, and there were no unpaid wages. The preliminary hearing determined whether the claimant was an employee or worker of the respondent for the purposes of those claims.
The tribunal found that the claimant had an explicit contractual relationship with Matrix governing her engagement with the respondent, and that there was no necessity to infer a contract between the claimant and the respondent. It accepted that the claimant's role changed and that she negotiated a pay increase directly with the respondent, but found that those matters did not make the arrangement inconsistent with a genuine agency staff arrangement.
The tribunal concluded that the claimant was neither an employee nor a worker of the respondent within the meaning of section 230 Employment Rights Act 1996. It therefore held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the breach of contract or unauthorised deductions from wages claims, and dismissed the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the claimant was not an employee of the respondent and therefore had no jurisdiction to consider the breach of contract claim. PDF text supplied for extraction was truncated. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the claimant was not a worker employed by the respondent and therefore had no jurisdiction to consider the unauthorised deductions from wages claim under s13 Employment Rights Act 1996. PDF text supplied for extraction was truncated. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 230(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 230(3)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.