Case 6020340/2024 · Employment Tribunal
T H Dulak v Advance Staff Ltd and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 6020340/2024
- Decision date
- 17 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
3 namedClaimant
T H Dulak
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningT H Dulak had not appeared by 10.30 am on the day of the hearing. The Tribunal recorded that it had received no explanation for his non-appearance.
Employment Judge Batten, sitting alone, exercised the Tribunal's powers under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024 and dismissed the claimant's claim. The judgment did not make separate findings on the merits of the breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages categories associated with the case, and it recorded no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Classification follows the supplied gov.uk listing category. The judgment refers only to the claimant's claim as a whole and records no separate merits determination. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Classification follows the supplied gov.uk listing category. The judgment refers only to the claimant's claim as a whole and records no separate merits determination. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.