Case 6020396/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Harding, counsel For the v Respondent — 2026
- Case reference
- 6020396/2026
- Decision date
- 26 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge James Representation
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr S Harding, counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr I Subramanian applied for interim relief in proceedings against Serve Local Limited, Mr M Thandapany and Ms S Mogane. Employment Judge James considered the written documents provided before and during the hearing and oral submissions from counsel.
The application did not succeed because the Judge could not be satisfied that it was likely that, on final determination of the complaint, the tribunal would find that the reason or principal reason for the claimant's dismissal was that he had made protected disclosures. This judgment did not finally determine the underlying complaint, and no monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The application for interim relief did not succeed. The underlying protected-disclosure dismissal complaint was not finally determined by this judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- “it is likely that” threshold under s.129 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.