Case 6020443/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Parkin v The Gymnastics Academy Heard at Leeds by CVP — 2025
- Case reference
- 6020443/2025
- Decision date
- 10 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Parkin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss J Parkin brought one claim for unauthorised deduction of wages against The Gymnastics Academy. The respondent did not appear, was not represented, and did not file a response. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had been employed from 4 November 2024 to 30 April 2025 and that she claimed unpaid wages for February, March and April 2025, together with expenses said to be reimbursable.
Having reviewed the oral and documentary evidence, the tribunal found that the respondent had not paid the claimant £6,334.03 and that this sum was due from the respondent to the claimant. It therefore upheld the unauthorised deduction of wages claim and ordered payment of £6,334.03. No separate split of the award by month or by expenses was set out; the judgment records only the total sum found to be due.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had not paid the claimant the sum of £6,334.03 and that the amount was due to her by way of unauthorised deduction of wages. | Upheld | — | £6,334 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,334
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.