Claimant v H V Energy Solutions Ltd — 2026

Case reference: 6020452/2024
Decision date: 14 January 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Anstis

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Respondent

H V Energy Solutions Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 14 January 2026, to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons given were non-compliance with the Tribunal's Order dated 21 October 2025 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.

The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out, and the hearing listed for 30 March 2026 was cancelled.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment strikes out the claim for non-compliance with the Tribunal's 21 October 2025 Order and because it had not been actively pursued; it does not address the merits of the unfair dismissal claim.	Struck out	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment strikes out the claim for non-compliance with the Tribunal's 21 October 2025 Order and because it had not been actively pursued; it does not address the merits of the unlawful deduction from wages claim.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.