Case 6020508/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Circignaco v Coffee for Envy Heard By: Newcastle Employment Tribunal By: Cloud Video Platform (CVP) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6020508/2024
- Decision date
- 4 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Circignaco
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a complaint of unlawful deduction from wages against Coffee for Envy. The respondent did not attend and was not represented at the hearing before Employment Judge Martin on 4 March 2025.
The tribunal held that the complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was well founded. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £774.00; the judgment records that oral reasons were given and that the parties could apply for written reasons within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the complaint of unlawful deduction from wages is well founded and orders payment of £774.00. Oral reasons were given, but no written reasons are included in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | £774 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £774
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.