Case 6020597/2025 · Employment Tribunal
S Elmenshawy First v Seaham Harbour Dock Company Second Respondent: Victoria Group — 2026
- Case reference
- 6020597/2025
- Decision date
- 4 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
S Elmenshawy First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant brought a complaint of 'ordinary' unfair dismissal relying on section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The case was heard in public by video at Newcastle before Employment Judge Aspden on 4 February 2026.
The judgment struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because it had no reasonable prospect of success. The written text of the operative sentence appears truncated after the words 'as the claimant', and no remedy was awarded or addressed in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of 'ordinary' unfair dismissal relying on section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is struck out because it has no reasonable prospect of success. The operative sentence appears truncated after 'as the claimant'. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.