Case 6020648/2024 · Employment Tribunal
MS O’HALLORAN (COUNSEL) FOR THE v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 6020648/2024
- Decision date
- 8 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
MS O’HALLORAN (COUNSEL) FOR THE
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by video at Llanelli Law Courts on 8 September 2025 before Employment Judge S Povey. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision record.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages and/or breach of contract, finding that the complaint was not made out. No monetary award was made in relation to that complaint.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's complaint of less favourable treatment under the Fixed-term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002. The decision record does not set out further factual findings or any remedy beyond dismissal of both complaints.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment described this as a complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages and/or breach of contract; it was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Fixed-term employee regulations | The complaint of less favourable treatment under the Fixed-term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002 was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.