Case 6020684/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Nelson v XS Hospitality Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6020684/2025
- Decision date
- 18 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Nelson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Leeds Employment Tribunal on 3 June 2025. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Lancaster determined that judgment could properly be entered under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal held that XS Hospitality Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Mr M Nelson's wages. The judgment identifies the deductions as relating to pay and accrued holiday entitlement outstanding at the date of termination.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Nelson the gross amount of £428.38. The hearing listed for 11 August 2025 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages, described as relating to pay and accrued holiday entitlement outstanding at the date of termination, and ordered payment of the gross sum of £428.38. | Upheld | — | £428 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £428
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.