Case 6020685/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A McGann v Adarga Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6020685/2025
- Decision date
- 14 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Welch
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A McGann
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 3 June 2025. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Welch decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £10,812.29 gross, which the judgment says included unpaid pension contributions. It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,400.00.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,405.18. The judgment records a total payment due of £14,721.90 and notes that the hearing listed for 12 September 2025 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment says this sum is gross and includes unpaid pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £10,812 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,400 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £2,405 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,722
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.