Case 6020782/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Limb v Cox & Baloney Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6020782/2024
- Decision date
- 31 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Limb
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 4 December 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Dawson on 28 April 2025 and sent to the parties on 31 May 2025.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £7,350 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, with damages of £2,200, and that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,840.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,200. It also found a breach of contract in respect of pension contributions and ordered damages of £2,744.99. The total of the sums ordered is £18,334.99.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £7,350 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment says the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £2,200 |
| Redundancy | The judgment records that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £3,840 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £2,200 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records a breach of contract in respect of the claimant’s pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £2,745 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18,335
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.