Case 6020788/2024 · Employment Tribunal
H Neal v The CBD Group Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6020788/2024
- Decision date
- 14 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
H Neal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages to be well-founded. The respondent had failed to pay the claimant for the entire period from 13 May 2024 to 28 October 2024, a span of 24 weeks.
Applying a gross weekly pay of £903.84, the tribunal calculated the total unpaid wages at £21,692.16 gross and ordered the respondent to pay that sum to the claimant, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance. The hearing previously listed for 17 April 2025 was cancelled, and the standard notice on interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 was attached.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found unauthorised deductions for the period 13 May 2024 to 28 October 2024 (24 weeks at a gross weekly pay of £903.84). Award is gross; claimant responsible for tax and NI. | Upheld | — | £21,692 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,692
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024 - Rule 22
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 Article 12
- Judgments Act 1838 s.17
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.