Case 6020824/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Hussey v Signature Medical Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6020824/2024
- Decision date
- 16 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Hussey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by the respondent as Head of Business Development from 16 March 2023 until 11 November 2024. His contract provided for a salary of £30,000 and a commission/bonus of up to 5% of the cost of surgery referred via referees/influencers he had recruited. He had been paid commission on all surgery performed up to 11 November 2024 and brought a breach of contract claim for £55,000 in respect of commission he said was due on surgeries performed after termination by referees he had signed up under three-year marketing contracts.
The Tribunal found that the marketing contracts were between the respondent and the referee/influencer only; the claimant was not a party to them and was not bound by their three-year fixed term. There was no express provision in the employment contract entitling him to commission for surgeries performed after the effective date of termination, and the entitlement to commission depended on surgery actually taking place and being paid for, which could not be anticipated. The alleged breach therefore arose, if at all, only after termination.
The Tribunal concluded that the claim did not arise and was not outstanding on the termination of employment for the purposes of article 4(c) of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994, and so the Tribunal had no jurisdiction. In the alternative, had it had jurisdiction, it would have found there was no contractual entitlement to post-termination commission and the claim would have been dismissed on the merits. The claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for unpaid commission/bonus totalling £55,000 (capped at £25,000 tribunal jurisdiction) in respect of surgeries performed after the effective date of termination (11 November 2024). The Tribunal held it lacked jurisdiction under article 3/4(c) of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 because the alleged breach was post-termination and the claim did not arise nor was outstanding at termination. In the alternative, the Tribunal would have found no contractual entitlement to post-termination commission and dismissed the claim on the merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994, article 3 and article 4(c)
- Marshal (Cambridge) Ltd v Hamblin [1994] ICR 962
- Fentem v Outform EMEA Ltd EA-2020-000851-BA
- O2 Czech Republic v QT (CJEU 2023)
- Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993 (SI 1993/3053)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.