Case 6020847/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Tamara Morris v East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust Record of a Preliminary Hearing at the Employment Tribunal — 2025
- Case reference
- 6020847/2025
- Decision date
- 20 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham Heard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Tamara Morris
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal considered, on the papers, whether a letter dated 16 May 2025 sent by the Respondent to ACAS and forwarded to the Claimant was protected by privilege or could be admitted because of alleged unambiguous impropriety. The Respondent argued that the letter was protected by statute and common law without prejudice privilege, while the Claimant argued that the communication was not privileged and contained unambiguous impropriety.
Employment Judge Butler held that the Claimant's allegations about the letter and the underlying factual matters had not been determined at this preliminary stage and could not establish unambiguous impropriety. The Tribunal found that the letter remained privileged and could not be admitted into evidence in the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The preliminary judgment refers to alleged disabilities and equality law issues, but it determines only whether a 16 May 2025 letter is privileged and admissible; it does not decide the disability discrimination claim. | Other | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The preliminary judgment refers to allegations of retaliatory conduct and protected act issues, but it determines only whether a 16 May 2025 letter is privileged and admissible; it does not decide the victimisation claim. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract appears in the listing category, but the provided judgment text determines only the privilege/admissibility issue and does not decide this claim. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Section 18(7) Employment Tribunals Act 1996
- without prejudice privilege
- unambiguous impropriety
- Unilever Plc v The Proctor and Gamble Co [2000] 1 WLR 2436
- Swiss Re Corporate Solutions Ltd v Sommer [2022] EAT 78
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.