Case 6020953/2024 · Employment Tribunal
C Andreia v Ceased Trading Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6020953/2024
- Decision date
- 7 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
C Andreia
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy judgment under Rule 22, the tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,728.00 for that claim. The judgment also states that the claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on the award.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of a further gross sum of £558.00 in respect of holiday pay. The listed hearing on 17 April 2025 was cancelled. The text attached to the judgment notice refers to 'Miss C Andreia v Amico Coffee Limited Company Number 10670529', while the operative judgment itself names the respondent as Ceased Trading Limited.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The operative judgment names the respondent as Ceased Trading Limited. The attached interest notice refers to 'Miss C Andreia v Amico Coffee Limited Company Number 10670529'. | Upheld | — | £2,728 |
| Holiday pay | The operative judgment names the respondent as Ceased Trading Limited. The attached interest notice refers to 'Miss C Andreia v Amico Coffee Limited Company Number 10670529'. | Upheld | — | £558 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,286
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.