Case 6020966/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Vusatyi v Enersys UK Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6020966/2025
- Decision date
- 2 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moore Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Vusatyi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 25 July 2025, the tribunal gave Mr K Vusatyi an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The tribunal said this was because he had not complied with its order of 23 June 2025 to provide further information on the discrimination complaints and to show cause why the unfair dismissal claim should not be struck out. The tribunal also recorded that the claim could not currently be sensibly responded to, that it had been presented out of time, and that it had not been actively pursued.
Mr K Vusatyi did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Moore on 26 August 2025 and sent to the parties on 2 October 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole. The reasons refer to the claimant having been ordered on 23 June 2025 to provide further information on the discrimination complaints and to show cause why the unfair dismissal claim should not be struck out; the tribunal also noted the claim was out of time and had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.