Case 6020973/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr V Sion v Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust — 2026
- Case reference
- 6020973/2024
- Decision date
- 10 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hastie Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr V Sion
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal refused the Claimant's application to amend the claim.
The Tribunal found that the discrimination claims were not brought within the applicable time limit. It was not just and equitable to extend time, so the Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claims and dismissed them.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment refers generally to discrimination claims being out of time and dismissed; the age category is taken from the case listing context. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment refers generally to discrimination claims being out of time and dismissed; the race category is taken from the case listing context. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment refers generally to discrimination claims being out of time and dismissed; the sex category is taken from the case listing context. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.