Case 6021151/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Edward White v DSG Enterprises Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6021151/2025
- Decision date
- 20 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Edward White
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEdward White presented his claim on 6 June 2025. DSG Enterprises LTD did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that the claim could properly be determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The Tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from Mr White's wages between 1 December 2024 and 25 March 2025 and ordered it to pay £8,011.28 gross. It also ordered payment of £1,666.52 gross for unpaid holiday entitlement and £418.99 in breach-of-contract damages for unpaid employer pension contributions. The total award was £10,096.79.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award was stated as a gross sum for unauthorised deductions made between 1 December 2024 and 25 March 2025. | Upheld | — | £8,011 |
| Holiday pay | The award for unpaid holiday entitlement was stated as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £1,667 |
| Breach of contract | Damages were awarded for the failure to pay employer pension contributions into the claimant's pension. | Upheld | — | £419 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,097
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.