Case 6021234/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Coates v White Lodge Hotel Filey Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6021234/2024
- Decision date
- 1 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Edwards Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Coates
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Leeds by video on 1 October 2025 before Employment Judge S Edwards. The claimant, Mr M Coates, appeared in person and the respondent, White Lodge Hotel Filey Ltd, was represented by Mr W Rusling, Director.
The only recorded substantive decision was that the complaint of automatic unfair dismissal for asserting a statutory right was not well founded and was dismissed. The written record does not set out further findings or reasons beyond that conclusion.
No monetary award was recorded, and no separate remedy components were identified in the judgment. The notes state that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note to the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was described as automatic unfair dismissal for asserting a statutory right. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.