Case 6021261/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Faiza Leacataly v Moahmmed Umair Shariq — 2025
- Case reference
- 6021261/2024
- Decision date
- 14 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Balroop Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Faiza Leacataly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, Faiza Leacataly, brought a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against the Respondent, Moahmmed Umair Shariq. The matter was heard at East London Hearing Centre via CVP on 14 May 2025 before Employment Judge D Balroop. The Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent did not attend.
The Tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages to be well-founded. The Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages of 179 hours at £11.90 per hour, covering the period from August to November 2024.
The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £2,130.10, being the gross sum deducted, with the Claimant remaining responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that amount.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found unauthorised deduction of 179 hours at £11.90 per hour from August to November 2024. | Upheld | — | £2,130 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,130
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.