Case 6021362/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. P Saxholm v Global Transport Solutions Limited (formerly Snowfall Services Limited) in voluntary liquidation. — 2025
- Case reference
- 6021362/2024
- Decision date
- 19 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smart
- Venue
- London Central Method By Video
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. P Saxholm
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent presented no ET3 and did not appear at the hearing. The Tribunal found the claims were presented in time and that there was sufficient information in the ET1 to calculate the uncontested debts owed to the Claimant under rule 22. It also ordered amendment of the Respondent’s name to match the heading of the judgment.
The Claimant was employed from 27 November 2020 to 4 October 2024. The Tribunal declared that the Respondent had breached the Claimant’s contract of employment, had failed to pay accrued but untaken annual leave on termination, and had unlawfully deducted wages. It ordered £38,000 gross for linked deductions of wages for April, July, August and September 2024, £3,500 in damages for breach of contract for pension contributions for March to September 2024, and £6,311 gross for 13 days’ accrued but untaken annual leave.
The judgment records that £44,311 was payable subject to income tax deductions via PAYE, with £3,500 tax free, giving a total gross amount payable of £47,811. It also states that if the Claimant is paid the gross amounts by the Respondent, he has agreed to account to HMRC for all tax due via a personal tax return. The Claimant’s claims for employer pension contributions were struck out under rule 38(1)(a) on jurisdictional and prospects-of-success grounds.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Ordered as gross pay for linked deductions of wages for April, July, August and September 2024, at £10,000 per month with employee pension contributions of £500 per month already deducted. | Upheld | — | £38,000 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for breach of contract for failing to pay pension contributions into the Claimant’s pension scheme for March to September 2024, at £500 per month for 7 months. | Upheld | — | £3,500 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for 13 days’ accrued but untaken annual leave on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £6,311 |
| Breach of contract | The Claimant’s claims for employer pension contributions were struck out under rule 38(1)(a) because the Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear them and that they had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £47,811
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.