Case 6021402/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Alexander v Clinics Operations Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6021402/2024
- Decision date
- 17 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge NM Hosie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Alexander
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge NM Hosie issued judgment on the available material under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on 17 June 2025. The tribunal held that the respondent had unlawfully withheld wages and ordered payment of £2,235.03 net, with reference to the September 2024 payslip provided.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,723.08 gross, calculated at £307.69 per day for 5.6 days of accrued holiday. The respondent was given liberty to deduct Income Tax and Employee National Insurance Contributions, if required by law, before payment, with remittance of any deductions to HMRC and written evidence to the claimant. The awards together total £3,958.11 before any lawful deductions from the sums payable.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully withheld wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £2,235.03, referring to the September 2024 payslip. | Upheld | — | £2,235 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,723.08, calculated on the basis of £307.69 per day for 5.6 days accrued holiday. | Upheld | — | £1,723 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,958
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.