Case 6021443/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Vyas v Echo BMS Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6021443/2025
- Decision date
- 15 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Daniels Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Vyas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal dismissed Echo BMS Ltd's counterclaim. It also dismissed Mr P Vyas's claim for unlawful deductions from wages concerning deductions made in relation to the relevant notice period, finding that claim was not well founded.
Mr Vyas's claim for accrued holiday was well founded. The Tribunal found that Echo BMS Ltd made unlawful deductions from his wages when it deducted statutory holiday leave from his pay in April 2025. It awarded him the gross sum of £723.91 for unpaid accrued holiday, subject to statutory deductions.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The employer's counterclaim was dismissed. The judgment does not identify the legal basis of the counterclaim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim concerning deductions relating to the relevant notice period was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The accrued holiday claim was well founded; the award was stated as a gross sum before statutory deductions. | Upheld | — | £724 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £724
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.