Case 6021513/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A N Simpson v Ingenia Resourcing & Recruitment Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6021513/2024
- Decision date
- 17 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heather REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A N Simpson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Newcastle by CVP before Employment Judge Heather on 17 March 2025. The respondent did not attend or provide representation. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's notice pay complaint was well-founded and awarded £2,000 as damages for breach of contract, calculated using gross pay because the tribunal considered that the claimant would likely have to pay tax on it as post-employment notice pay.
The tribunal also found that the holiday pay complaint was well-founded. It held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when the claimant's employment ended, and ordered payment of £1,230.80, with tax and National Insurance to be dealt with by the claimant.
On redundancy, the tribunal determined under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996 that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,384.59. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay complaint was well-founded. The tribunal awarded £2,000 as gross damages and said this was calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant would have to pay tax on it as post-employment notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,000 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay complaint was well-founded. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages because the respondent had not paid for holidays accrued but untaken when employment ended; the claimant was told to account for any tax or National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,231 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal determined under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996 that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,384.59. | Upheld | — | £1,385 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,615
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.