Case 6021584/2024 · Employment Tribunal
D Robinson-Young (counsel) For the v Respondent — 2026
- Case reference
- 6021584/2024
- Decision date
- 13 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge W Anderson Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
D Robinson-Young (counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, A Twigg, brought a claim of unfair dismissal against Chronicle Software Limited. The matter was heard by Employment Judge W Anderson sitting alone at Reading (by video) on 12 and 13 February 2026, with counsel appearing for both parties.
The tribunal dismissed the claim of unfair dismissal. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,100, being the costs of a wasted hearing on 22 September 2025, payable within 21 days of the judgment being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim. Written reasons were not provided with this judgment record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,100
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.