Case 6021599/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C I Marginean v Argent Catering Solutions UK Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6021599/2025
- Decision date
- 2 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C I Marginean
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Miller, sitting at Hull by video on 2 October 2025, heard a complaint by Ms C I Marginean against Argent Catering Solutions UK Ltd. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Sclater, a director.
The tribunal found that the respondent was in breach of contract by failing to pay the claimant a contractual redundancy payment, and held that complaint to be well-founded. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £2,000 as damages for breach of contract, with the figure calculated using gross pay to reflect the possibility that the claimant may have to pay tax on it.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons will not be provided unless requested in accordance with the standard 14-day rule. No other claims (including unfair dismissal or statutory redundancy pay) were adjudicated in this written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Complaint that the respondent was in breach of contract by failing to pay a contractual redundancy payment; well-founded. Damages calculated using gross pay to reflect possible tax liability. | Upheld | — | £2,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.