Case 6021630/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. K. Pokhrel v B Wolverhampton Ltd. Hearing: Final Hearing — 2026
- Case reference
- 6021630/2025
- Decision date
- 19 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tinnion Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. K. Pokhrel
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that Mr K. Pokhrel was not an employee of B Wolverhampton Ltd.
The Tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the wages claim relating to 15 May 2024 to 20 November 2024 because it had been reasonably practicable for Mr Pokhrel to present that claim in time. Without prejudice to that jurisdictional decision, it also found that this part of the claim was not well founded.
The wages claim relating to 21 November 2024 to 10 June 2025 was presented in time and fell within the Tribunal's jurisdiction, but the Tribunal found that it was not well founded. The wages claims were dismissed. No monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The wages claim for 15 May 2024 to 20 November 2024 was outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction because it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time; the Tribunal also found it was not well founded. The wages claim for 21 November 2024 to 10 June 2025 was presented in time but was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.