Mr A Ohman v Aussiejack Limited — 2025

Case reference: 6021882/2024
Decision date: 17 April 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer Date

Indexed: 17 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr A Ohman

Respondent

Aussiejack Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The respondent did not present a response to the claim in time. The Employment Judge determined that the claim, including remedy, could be decided without a hearing under Rule 22.

The Tribunal entered judgment that the respondent made an unlawful deduction from wages in September 2024. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £1,900, after usual payroll deductions, and dismissed the claimant's remedy claims for rent payment and emotional distress because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to award them.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	Rule 22 judgment entered after the respondent failed to present a response in time. The Tribunal also dismissed the claimant's remedy claims for rent payment and emotional distress because it had no jurisdiction to award them.	Upheld	—	£1,900

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £1,900; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.