Case 6021930/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Jaswant Singh Rajpurohit v Dragonfly BN1 Limited T/A Indian Summer — 2025
- Case reference
- 6021930/2025
- Decision date
- 13 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Liz Ord
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jaswant Singh Rajpurohit
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at Croydon by CVP on 13 October 2025 before Employment Judge Liz Ord, with the claimant, Jaswant Singh Rajpurohit, appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr C Berman. The written judgment records that the claimant pursued holiday pay and arrears of pay claims against Dragonfly BN1 Limited T/A Indian Summer.
The tribunal stated that the claimant's claim for holiday pay and arrears of pay was not well-founded and dismissed it. The written record does not set out separate factual findings for each head of claim and records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The written judgment states that the claimant's claim for holiday pay was not well-founded and was dismissed; it does not separate the reasoning from the arrears of pay head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment states that the claimant's claim for arrears of pay was not well-founded and was dismissed; the decision does not give separate findings on this head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.