Case 6021961/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Keyleigh Everton v Lionheart Security Services Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6021961/2024
- Decision date
- 4 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Macdonald
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Keyleigh Everton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Macdonald struck out Keyleigh Everton’s claim against Lionheart Security Services Ltd on 4 August 2026. The tribunal had written to the claimant on 10 August 2025 warning that it was considering striking out the claim because the claimant had not complied with its order dated 3 February 2025 and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant replied that they wished to pursue the claim, but gave no reasons why it should not be struck out and did not request a hearing. The tribunal found that the claimant had failed to comply with its orders despite repeated opportunities. It was satisfied that the grounds for striking out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 applied and that striking out accorded with the overriding objective in Rule 3. The judgment records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type. The claim was struck out under Rule 38 for non-compliance with tribunal orders and failure actively to pursue the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 3 overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.