Case 6021962/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Directors Cut Films Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6021962/2024
- Decision date
- 15 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy with no consultation process whatsoever. The claimant was awarded a protective award of £5,600, and the listed hearing on 12 and 13 June 2025 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment is a short rule 22 default judgment. It states that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy with no consultation process and is entitled to a protective award, but does not provide a fuller claim label or remedy breakdown. | Upheld | — | £5,600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,600
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.