Case 6021968/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Singh v Samsons Cash & Carry Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6021968/2025
- Decision date
- 22 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp
- Venue
- Newport
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Singh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr J Singh’s complaints in their entirety: unfair dismissal, unauthorised deduction from wages, holiday pay and notice pay. The notice pay complaint is classified here as breach of contract. No monetary award was recorded.
The complaints were struck out because they had been presented outside the statutory time limit and the Tribunal found that it had been reasonably practicable to bring the proceedings in time. The Tribunal also stated that, if that conclusion were incorrect, it would have held that the further period before presentation was not reasonable.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment identifies this as a notice pay complaint. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable to bring the proceedings in time
- whether the further period was reasonable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.