Case 6021976/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Burgess v Supported Housing North West HELD AT: Manchester (in public; CVP) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6021976/2024
- Decision date
- 24 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Burgess
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claimant's failure to make reasonable adjustments allegation at paragraph 12(2) of the list of issues, regarding the adjustment of not searching the laptop. The stated basis was Rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024, because that allegation had no reasonable prospects of success.
All other applications for strike out and/or a deposit order were refused. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment strikes out the failure to make reasonable adjustments allegation at paragraph 12(2) of the list of issues, concerning the adjustment of not searching the laptop, under Rule 38(1)(a) as having no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
- no reasonable prospects of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.