Case 6022000/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Nairn (in person) For the v Mr C Berman (consultant) — 2026
- Case reference
- 6022000/2024
- Decision date
- 17 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Nairn (in person) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal decided at an open preliminary hearing that the claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim had been presented out of time. It found that it had been reasonably practicable to present the claim in time and that, in any event, it had not been presented within a further reasonable period.
The constructive unfair dismissal claim was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The tribunal did not determine whether the claimant's money claims were presented in time, recording that this issue would be relisted for determination on a future date.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states the constructive unfair dismissal claim was presented out of time and was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to the claimant's money claims and states the time limit issue was not determined at this hearing and would be relisted. | Other | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment refers to the claimant's money claims and states the time limit issue was not determined at this hearing and would be relisted. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.