Case 6022057/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Olaru v Omni Facility Management Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6022057/2024
- Decision date
- 21 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Olaru
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs D Olaru's claim against Omni Facility Management Limited was for unlawful deduction from wages. At the hearing on 3 March 2025, Employment Judge Anderson sat alone at London Central. The judgment records that the claimant did not attend and that the respondent was represented by Mr Treston, Litigation Consultant.
The tribunal dismissed the unlawful deduction from wages claim under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because of the claimant's non-attendance. The judgment also states, in the alternative, that the claim would be struck out under Rule 38(1)(d) because it was not actively pursued. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 due to the claimant's non-attendance. The judgment states in the alternative that the claim would be struck out under Rule 38(1)(d) because it was not actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 38(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.