Case 6022067/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Patterson v Certa Precision Engineering Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6022067/2024
- Decision date
- 14 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Patterson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Leeds Employment Tribunal on 16 December 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the claimant, Mr N Patterson, was dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that basis, the judgment records that he is entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,304.16.
The hearing listed for 11 June 2025 was cancelled. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Shepherd on 2 May 2025 and sent to the parties on 14 May 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,304.16. | Upheld | — | £1,304 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,304
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.