Mr M Suttner v Broadstone PAC LLP — 2026

Case reference: 6022107/2024
Decision date: 29 July 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Self Appearances
Venue: Southampton

Indexed: 18 September 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr M Suttner

Respondent

Broadstone PAC LLP

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal dismissed Mr M Suttner's protected disclosure detriment claim against Broadstone PAC LLP as not well-founded. Employment Judge Self heard the case at Southampton on 27, 28 and 29 July 2026.

The judgment records the outcome without setting out factual findings or legal reasoning. No monetary award is recorded. The judgment was approved on 29 July 2026 and sent to the parties on 7 August 2026.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Whistleblowing	The protected disclosure detriment claim was dismissed as not well-founded.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.