Case 6022237/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Mcclure v Keld Cleaning Services — 2025
- Case reference
- 6022237/2024
- Decision date
- 14 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ayre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Mcclure
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Leeds Employment Tribunal on 17 December 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response in time, and Employment Judge Ayre determined that the claim could properly be decided under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure without a hearing.
The Tribunal declared that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £139.60 gross. This comprised £40.26 for a shortfall in September 2024 wages paid at £11 per hour instead of the correct rate of £11.44 per hour, and £99.34 for one day of unpaid wages (£11.44 per hour x 8 hours 41 minutes). The Tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £425.95 gross (£11.44 per hour x 37 hours 14 minutes).
The hearing previously listed for 3 June 2025 was cancelled. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Ayre on 14 May 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal declared unauthorised deductions from wages totalling £139.60 gross, comprising £40.26 (September 2024 shortfall at incorrect rate of £11/hr instead of £11.44/hr) and £99.34 (1 day unpaid wages at £11.44 x 8h 41m). Determined under rule 22 after respondent failed to present a valid response in time. | Upheld | — | £140 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay claimant's holiday entitlement; ordered to pay gross £425.95 (£11.44 per hour x 37 hours 14 minutes). The gov.uk listing categorised this under Working Time Regulations; the judgment frames it as unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £426 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £566
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.