Case 6022377/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Roger Meadows v Edencoast Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6022377/2025
- Decision date
- 24 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Roger Meadows
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 16 June 2025. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Tynan decided that the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that Edencoast Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Roger Meadows' wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £48,332.37, meaning a sum which, after any income tax and employee national insurance deductions, results in a payment to the claimant of £48,332.37. No other claims, remedy components, interest, or panel members were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. | Upheld | — | £48,332 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £48,332
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.