Case 6022425/2024 · Employment Tribunal
David Mason v Directors Cut Films Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6022425/2024
- Decision date
- 15 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Forde
Parties
2 namedClaimant
David Mason
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 within the deadline and did not apply for an extension of time. Employment Judge Forde considered the ET1 and the information provided by the claimant and decided that the claim could properly be determined without a hearing under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024.
The tribunal found that the claimant, David Mason, was dismissed by reason of redundancy and that there had been no consultation process whatsoever. On that basis, the tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a protective award.
The award recorded by the tribunal was £9,739.80. The listed hearing on 14 and 15 July 2025 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal recorded that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy with no consultation process whatsoever and was entitled to a protective award of £9,739.80. | Upheld | — | £9,740 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,740
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.