Case 6022430/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Tedros Mehari v Organic Restaurant Management Ltd t/a SALT — 2025
- Case reference
- 6022430/2025
- Decision date
- 10 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A.M.S Green
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Tedros Mehari
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave a Rule 22 judgment after a hearing at London Central by CVP on 10 December 2025. The respondent was not present or represented.
The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. The tribunal found that the respondent made deductions from the claimant's wages between 26 December 2024 and 31 March 2025 and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted.
The complaint in respect of holiday pay was also well-founded. The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant in accordance with regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered payment of the stated holiday pay sum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages for the period from 26 December 2024 to 31 March 2025. | Upheld | — | £6,584 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay holiday pay in accordance with regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £795 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,379
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.