Case 6022474/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Moore v EcoCharge Electrical Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6022474/2024
- Decision date
- 28 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Moore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs A Moore presented her claim in the Midlands East Employment Tribunal on 18 December 2024. The respondent, EcoCharge Electrical Ltd, did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Adkinson determined the claim under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal upheld the claimant’s complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £450 gross. It also upheld the claim that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £450.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,025. It also upheld the complaint that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £900. The judgment records that all future hearings were cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £450 gross. | Upheld | — | £450 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £450 damages. | Upheld | — | £450 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,025. | Upheld | — | £2,025 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £900. | Upheld | — | £900 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,825
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.