Case 6022558/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Lorrie Nader-Sepahi v MM Hearing Solutions Ltd trading as ‘HearX’ PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 6022558/2025
- Decision date
- 28 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Lorrie Nader-Sepahi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing heard at Bristol by CVP on 30 June 2025 before Employment Judge Midgley sitting alone. The claimant, Mrs Lorrie Nader-Sepahi, appeared in person and the respondent, MM Hearing Solutions Ltd trading as HearX, was represented by Miss Hennie Gillam, the respondent's Head of Development. The only application recorded in the judgment was the claimant's application for interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal dismissed the application for interim relief. The written record notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Application for interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.