Case 6022590/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Longworth v Shannon Court Care Home Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6022590/2024
- Decision date
- 21 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Longworth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that case number 6008667/2024 had previously been joined with case number 6022590/2024, and that case number 6008667/2024 had already been struck out by a judgment sent to the parties on 21 November 2025.
The respondent sought clarification because case number 6022590/2024 had not been referred to. The tribunal stated that the strike out application applied to both case numbers, and struck out case number 6022590/2024 for the reasons given in the judgment of 21 November 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment strikes out case number 6022590/2024 under Rule 38(1)(c) and (d). The PDF text does not set out the underlying factual reasons, instead referring to reasons given in the Judgment of 21st November 2025. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out case number 6022590/2024 under Rule 38(1)(c) and (d). The PDF text does not set out the underlying factual reasons, instead referring to reasons given in the Judgment of 21st November 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38(1)(c) & (d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.