Case 6022717/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J S T Fraser v Acklam’s Coaches Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6022717/2024
- Decision date
- 28 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J S T Fraser
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the complaints of direct disability discrimination, indirect disability discrimination, and failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability were not well-founded.
All three complaints were dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated period.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of direct disability discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed. Written reasons were not provided in this record. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of indirect disability discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed. Written reasons were not provided in this record. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability was not well-founded and was dismissed. Written reasons were not provided in this record. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.