Case 6022827/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend For the v LA Community Care — 2025
- Case reference
- 6022827/2024
- Decision date
- 20 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Morgan Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's wages and notice pay complaints under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the final hearing. It recorded that the claimant had been notified of the hearing and had been asked to provide information in advance.
The tribunal and clerks made repeated attempts to contact the claimant by telephone and email during the morning of the hearing, and the hearing was adjourned several times to allow time for a response. When no response was received, the tribunal ended the hearing and dismissed the claim, also noting non-compliance with the hearing directions and a failure to engage with the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the final hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim was dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the final hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.