Case 6022911/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Robinson v Jjs Management Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6022911/2024
- Decision date
- 5 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Robinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well-founded. It held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken when the claimant's employment ended.
The tribunal also found that, when proceedings began, the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars. It stated that there were no exceptional circumstances making a two-week award unjust or inequitable and that it was just and equitable to make an award equal to four weeks' gross pay. Remedy was left to be determined at a further hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well-founded and described the failure to pay accrued but untaken holiday as an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars; no specific claim_type enum is available for this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.