Case 6022915/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Quinn v Vista Living Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6022915/2024
- Decision date
- 5 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Quinn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 1 May 2025 in Manchester by CVP, Employment Judge Childe dismissed the claimant's complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay. The tribunal recorded that this complaint was not well-founded.
The tribunal upheld the complaint in respect of holiday pay. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages by failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken on the date employment ended.
The tribunal ordered Vista Living Limited to pay the claimant £312.50. The claimant was made responsible for any tax or National Insurance on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Complaint in relation to notice pay; the tribunal held it was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended. | Upheld | — | £313 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £313
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.