Case 6022948/2024 · Employment Tribunal
S Dealey v R W Waste Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6022948/2024
- Decision date
- 4 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray
Parties
2 namedClaimant
S Dealey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Southampton Employment Tribunal on 23 December 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's breach of contract claim in respect of notice. It found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and awarded damages of £3,200.
The tribunal also upheld the claim for unpaid holiday entitlement and ordered the respondent to pay £407.13. The total amount payable under the judgment was £3,607.13.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £3,200. | Upheld | — | £3,200 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £407.13. | Upheld | — | £407 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,607
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.