Case 6023027/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Kingsley Iduseri v SVLhealthcare (in administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6023027/2024
- Decision date
- 27 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Searley Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Kingsley Iduseri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningKingsley Iduseri brought claims against SVLhealthcare (in administration) for unfair dismissal, unlawful deductions from wages, and a protective award under s.189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The hearing took place at East London Hearing Centre on 27 May 2025 before Employment Judge E Searley. The respondent did not attend.
The unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed because the Claimant withdrew it. The judgment records that dismissal expressly as following a withdrawal, rather than on the merits.
The Tribunal found that the Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages by failing to pay overtime for July 2024 and August 2024. The unpaid amounts were £1,012.89 for July and £584.16 for August, giving a gross sum deducted of £1,597.05. The judgment directs payment of that gross sum and states that the Respondent is responsible for tax and National Insurance deductions at source.
The Tribunal also found that the Claimant's s.189 TULRCA complaint was well founded because the Respondent had failed to comply with s.188. It ordered a protective award for the class of employees to which the Claimant belonged for a remuneration period of 90 days beginning on 30 August 2024. No financial amount was set out for that protective award in the judgment, and the note explains that the Claimant must seek quantification of any individual award separately.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages for unpaid overtime in July 2024 (£1,012.89) and August 2024 (£584.16), totalling £1,597.05 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,597 |
| Trade union | The complaint under s.189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded because the Respondent failed to comply with s.188. The Tribunal made a protective award for a 90-day period beginning on 30 August 2024, but did not quantify an individual financial award in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,597
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.189(3) TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.